Practice Specialties of John C. Lane & the John C. Lane Law Firm John C. Lane and the Lane Law Firm Contact John C. Lane & the John C. Lane Law Firm
Home   Contact   About Us    
Web Site Areas Articles from the Lane Law Firm                                           

Main Page
About The Firm
Attorney Profiles
Practice Areas

Case Histories
Legal News
Legal Articles
Contact Us

The Lane Law Firm Newsletter

Featured Article

 

 

 

 

 

 
Featured Article 
April 2009


The “America’s Cup” Is Decided by the New York Court of Appeals

The “preeminent international sailing regatta,” and its interesting history and the trust document that started it all, more than 150 years ago, are all combined in this very recent decision of the New York high court just in time for the beginning of yachting season here in the Northeast. The case is officially known as Golden Gate Yacht Club v. Societe Nautique de Geneve (decided April 2, 2009), and is a far cry from the usual stuff that fills a decision on the interpretation of a dry trust document.

“The story of the America’s Cup begins on August 22, 1851, after the schooner yacht, America, entered a race against British sailing vessels around the Isle of Wight, winning a large silver cup.” That cup became the “America’s Cup” and so remains to this day. It was used as the corpus of a charitable trust embodied in a Deed of Gift and was donated to the New York Yacht Club in 1857. The Deed of Gift establishes the rules governing the America’s Cup race and provides that the holder of the Cup becomes the sole trustee and is succeeded only by a successful challenger in a race at sea.

The original Deed required only that the challenger be an “organized” yacht club. That led to 30 years of problems, including disappointing races with challenging vessels which could not withstand the “rigors” of open sea competition. The Countess of Dufferin had “fresh water written all over her,” according to reports, while the Atalanta, another challenger, was denounced as “a new yacht, hastily built and totally untried and miserably equipped.” In 1887 George L. Schuyler, the sole-surviving donor, amended the Deed to require that a challenger be an organized yacht club from a country other than the current champion, incorporated or licensed by the Legislature, admiralty or other executive department, and “having for its annual regatta an ocean water course.” That last stipulation was at the center of this dispute.

The Deed provides that a challenger must submit a notice of challenge and demonstrate that it meets all of the stipulated requirements. The first to do so becomes the successful Challenger of Record, with the right to compete against the current Champion. The first notice of challenge for the 33rd America’s Cup race was submitted by Club Nautico de Vela, of Spain. Plaintiff Golden Gate Yacht Club submitted its own notice of challenge. Golden Gate met all of the requirements. Club Nautico did not.

Golden Gate challenged the submission by Club Nautico Espanol de Vela because it did not meet the requirement that it hold “its annual regatta [on] an ocean water course or sea.” In fact, Club Nautico was newly formed and had never held an annual regatta. Club Nautico urged the court to give a different interpretation to what is very clear language in the 1887 deed, allegedly to discern the true intent of the settlor of the trust. The Court of Appeals refused and held that Golden Gate Yacht Club, not Club Nautico Espanol de Vela, had qualified as the Challenger of Record for the 33rd America’s Cup competition.

“The right to act as trustee of the America’s Cup should be decided on the water and not in the courtroom,” said the Court. “This noble sailing tradition should remain a perpetual Challenge Cup for friendly competition between foreign countries (Deed of Gift, October 24, 1887, ¶ 3).”

 

For comments on this article, or questions to John C. Lane:

 

 
© 2008 by: The Law Offices of John C. Lane
Contact Our Offices
Email the Law Offices of John C. Lane: